Luce v. City of McKinney, Texas
| Jacob Luce |
| City of McKinney, Texas |
| 26-40478 |
| August 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce [ # 16 ] [26-40478] (ABT) [Entered: 09/25/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [16]. Date of service: 09/23/2026 [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 09/24/2026 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 15 LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce referencing Transcript filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce in 26-40478 [6]. Appellant's motion for transcripts at government expense pending in district court. [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 09/23/2026 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - motion for transcripts at government expense is pending. [26-40478] (ABT) [Entered: 09/11/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT received for Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Chris Hwang, Financial Arrangement Made: n. Motion for transcripts at government expense is pending in district court. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled [26-40478] (ABT) [Entered: 09/11/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga for party Appellee City of McKinney, Texas, in case 26-40478 [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 09/02/2026 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-40478] (Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga ) [Entered: 09/01/2026 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Allen Klement for party Appellee City of McKinney, Texas, in case 26-40478 [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 09/01/2026 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Christopher Allen Klement for City of McKinney, Texas for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-40478] (Christopher Allen Klement ) [Entered: 09/01/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Chris Hwang, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 02/25/2026. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 09/08/2026 for Chris Hwang. [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 08/26/2026 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/03/2026 for Appellant Jacob Luce [26-40478] (JAK) [Entered: 08/19/2026 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob Luce. [26-40478] (DLJ) [Entered: 08/10/2026 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Luce v. City of McKinney, Texas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jacob Luce | |
| Represented By: | Jacob Luce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of McKinney, Texas | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Allen Klement |
| Represented By: | Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
