Alanis v. Ramirez
| Angel Adalberto Alanis, Jr. |
| Pablo Ramirez, Officer, Badge No. C-10, in his individual capacity, Leonel Cantu, Investigator, in his individual capacity, John Doe #1, Hidalgo County Assistant District Attorney, in his individual capacity, John Doe #2, Hidalgo County District Attorney, in his individual capacity, Toribio Palacios, Hidalgo County District Attorney, in his official capacity and John Doe #3, Hidalgo County Assistant District Attorney, in his individual capacity |
| 26-40591 |
| September 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Angel Adalberto Alanis, Jr. [26-40591] (DLJ) [Entered: 09/28/2026 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alanis v. Ramirez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angel Adalberto Alanis, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Angel Adalberto Alanis Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pablo Ramirez, Officer, Badge No. C-10, in his individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | J. Arnold Aguilar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Leonel Cantu, Investigator, in his individual capacity | |
| Represented By: | J. Arnold Aguilar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe #1, Hidalgo County Assistant District Attorney, in his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe #2, Hidalgo County District Attorney, in his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Toribio Palacios, Hidalgo County District Attorney, in his official capacity | |
| Represented By: | Leigh Ann Tognetti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe #3, Hidalgo County Assistant District Attorney, in his individual capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.