Smith v. Guerrero
Petitioner: Roy Edward Smith
Respondent: Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 26-40686
Filed: November 3, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2026 Filing 2 FILING FEE is required. Fee due on 12/03/2026 for Appellant Roy Edward Smith [26-40686] (BLG) [Entered: 11/03/2026 03:31 PM]
November 3, 2026 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Roy Edward Smith [26-40686] (BLG) [Entered: 11/03/2026 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smith v. Guerrero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Tomee Morgan Heining
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roy Edward Smith
Represented By: Roy Edward Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?