Thomas v. Gray Television Group
Plaintiff: Daniel M. Thomas
Defendant: Gray Television Group, Incorporated
Case Number: 26-40690
Filed: November 5, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Amer w/Disabilities Act-Employment
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2026 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/20/2026 for Appellant Daniel M. Thomas [26-40690] (MVM) [Entered: 11/05/2026 03:00 PM]
November 5, 2026 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Daniel M. Thomas. [26-40690] (DLJ) [Entered: 11/05/2026 10:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas v. Gray Television Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gray Television Group, Incorporated
Represented By: Jana Scott Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel M. Thomas
Represented By: Paul Wesley Simon Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?