Reyna v. Nelson
| Joseph Anthony Reyna |
| Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State |
| 26-50004 |
| January 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Amer w/Disabilities Act - Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
JUDGMENT ENTERED AND FILED. [26-50004] (MFY) [Entered: 07/01/2026 03:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [26-50004 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: SKD , Judge: DMD Mandate issue date is 07/22/2026 [26-50004] (MFY) [Entered: 07/01/2026 02:59 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
CLERK ORDER granting filing of brief in its present form. [25] [26-50004] (MFY) [Entered: 06/15/2026 04:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
BRIEFING COMPLETE. [26-50004] (MFY) [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Anthony Reyna in 26-50004 [ # 12 ] Brief has been deemed sufficient. Sufficient Brief deadline satisfied [26-50004] (MFY) [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:46 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Joseph Anthony Reyna. Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the citations to the record. Additionally the statement of oral argument section is out of order. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. DIS-1 Remedy deadline satisfied.. Sufficient Brief due on 04/23/2026 for Appellant Joseph Anthony Reyna. [26-50004] (LEF) [Entered: 04/09/2026 10:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
DISMISSAL NOTICE ISSUED for failure to file appellant's brief [11] A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled. DIS-1 Remedy due on 04/14/2026 for Appellant Joseph Anthony Reyna. [26-50004] (LEF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/23/2026 for Appellant Joseph Anthony Reyna. [26-50004] (PAC) [Entered: 02/09/2026 11:56 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-50004] (PAC) [Entered: 02/09/2026 11:55 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: erroneously issued notice [26-50004] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/16/2026 02:46 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:25-CV-1676. Electronic ROA due on 02/02/2026. [26-50004] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/16/2026 02:18 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-50004] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/16/2026 02:16 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joseph Anthony Reyna [26-50004] (RLJ) [Entered: 01/05/2026 03:28 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Reyna v. Nelson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Reyna | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Anthony Reyna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jane Nelson, in her official capacity as Texas Secretary of State | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
