Jordan v. District Attorney
| Charles Jordan |
| District Attorney, Bastrop County, Texas, John Does 1-3, Bastrop County Sheriff Deputies, Bastrop County Jail, State of Texas, Greg Abbott, Governor and Cop Caller |
| 26-50008 |
| January 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for to extend time to pay filing fee [12] [26-50008] (RLJ) [Entered: 02/25/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 11 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 02/18/2026 for Appellant Charles Jordan. [26-50008] (SEP) [Entered: 02/09/2026 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Charles Jordan because Appellant has 3 strikes and must pay the fee. [26-50008] (CAG) [Entered: 02/03/2026 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 02/02/2026 for Appellant Charles Jordan [26-50008] (RSM) [Entered: 01/16/2026 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [4] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Jordan. [4] [26-50008] (CAG) [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Jordan [26-50008] (CAS) [Entered: 01/07/2026 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
