Biggerstaff v. Brown
| Dustin Allen Biggerstaff |
| B. J. Brown, Defense Attorney B.J. Brown Attorney at Law, Justin Low, Distrtict Judge 161st District Court Ector County, Dusty Gallivan, District Attorney Ector County D.A., Kortney Williams, Assistant District Attorney Ector County D.A., Cody Dunstan, CID Special Agent DPS and Daniel Sarabia, CID Special Agent DPS |
| 26-50108 |
| February 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 DOCUMENT filed by Appellant Mr. Dustin Allen Biggerstaff-- notice of sending DC motion for IFP. [26-50108] (CAS) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Dustin Allen Biggerstaff to appoint counsel [11]. Date of service: 02/20/2026 [26-50108] (CAS) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [10] [26-50108] (NMF) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/20/2026 for Appellant Dustin Allen Biggerstaff [26-50108] (NMF) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [4] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Dustin Allen Biggerstaff. [4] [26-50108] (NMF) [Entered: 02/20/2026 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Dustin Allen Biggerstaff [26-50108] (LEF) [Entered: 02/11/2026 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
