Mathai v. USA
| Koshy Mathews Mathai |
| United States of America |
| 26-50253 |
| April 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Personal Liability |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [26-50253] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai. Date of service: 05/23/2026 via email - Appellant Mathai; Attorney for Appellee: Mueller [26-50253] (Koshy Mathews Mathai ) [Entered: 05/23/2026 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 17 APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 06/22/2026 for Appellee United States of America [26-50253] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai. Date of service: 05/23/2026 via email - Appellant Mathai; Attorney for Appellee: Mueller [26-50253] (Koshy Mathews Mathai ) [Entered: 05/23/2026 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 16 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai [ # 12 ] [26-50253] (MFY) [Entered: 05/20/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [12]. [26-50253] (MFY) [Entered: 05/19/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/02/2026 for Appellant Koshy Mathews Mathai. [26-50253] (RA) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [26-50253] (RA) [Entered: 04/23/2026 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew Mueller for Appellee USA in 26-50253 [26-50253] (PAC) [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Matthew Mueller for USA for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-50253] (Matthew Mueller ) [Entered: 04/23/2026 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:24-CV-612. Electronic ROA due on 05/01/2026. [26-50253] (NMF) [Entered: 04/16/2026 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-50253] (NMF) [Entered: 04/16/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [26-50253] (MFY) [Entered: 04/24/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Koshy Mathews Mathai [26-50253] (NMF) [Entered: 04/02/2026 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mathai v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Koshy Mathews Mathai | |
| Represented By: | Koshy Mathews Mathai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Mueller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.