Alvarez v. Voyles
| Joaquin Alvarez |
| Michael W. Voyles, Assistant Warden, Annette Martinez, Assistant Warden, Michelle Washburn, Classification Member, J. Riley, Grievance Manager and Unknown, Grievance Manager |
| 26-50412 |
| May 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Joaquin Alvarez [ # 12 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 08/07/2026 for Appellant Joaquin Alvarez [26-50412] (CAS) [Entered: 07/15/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Joaquin Alvarez to extend time to file brief as appellant until 08/17/2026 [12]. Date of service: 06/26/2026 [26-50412] (CAS) [Entered: 07/14/2026 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 6:25-CV-133. Electronic ROA due on 06/15/2026. [26-50412] (RSM) [Entered: 05/29/2026 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 07/08/2026 for Appellant Joaquin Alvarez. [26-50412] (RSM) [Entered: 05/29/2026 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-50412] (RSM) [Entered: 05/29/2026 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [4] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joaquin Alvarez. [4] [26-50412] (RLJ) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Joaquin Alvarez [26-50412] (CAS) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
