Rogers v. Patrick
| Kate Rogers |
| Dan Patrick and Dawn Buckingham |
| 26-50722 |
| August 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Benjamin Wallace Mendelson for party(s) Appellant Dan Patrick, in case 26-50722 [26-50722] (RSM) [Entered: 09/04/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William R. Peterson for party(s) Appellant Dan Patrick, in case 26-50722 [26-50722] (RSM) [Entered: 09/04/2026 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Dan Patrick advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes - No hearings. [26-50722] (PAC) [Entered: 09/02/2026 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 7 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [7] Parties added: Appellant Dawn Buckingham. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Dawn Buckingham. [7], added to case. [26-50722] (LEF) [Entered: 09/02/2026 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Dan Patrickfor the Court to process. Date of service: 09/01/2026 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Farrell; Attorney for Appellee: Hartry. [26-50722] (William Howard Farrell ) [Entered: 09/01/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [26-50722] (Benjamin Wallace Mendelson ) [Entered: 09/01/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-50722] (William R. Peterson ) [Entered: 09/01/2026 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Dan Patrick [26-50722] (NMF) [Entered: 08/28/2026 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
