Consumers' Research v. FCC
| Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Edward J. Blum, Kersten Conway, Suzanne Bettac, Robert Kull, Kwang Ja Kirby, Tom Kirby, Joseph Bayly, Jeremy Roth, Deanna Roth, Lynn Gibbs, Paul Gibbs, Rhonda Thomas, James Romeo, Cody Carnett, Phillip Aronoff and Jacqueline Klein |
| Federal Communications Commission and United States of America |
| 26-60214 |
| April 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Caroline W. Tan. [ # 22 ] [26-60214] (RLL) [Entered: 06/15/2026 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 23 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Samuel Benjamin Goldstein for party(s) Respondent USA, in case 26-60214 [26-60214] (ABT) [Entered: 06/15/2026 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION filed by Attorney Ms. Caroline W. Tan for Respondent USA to withdraw as counsel [22]. Date of Service: 06/12/2026 via US mail - Attorney for Respondent: Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General; email - Attorney for Respondents: Carr, Ellison, Tan; Attorney for Petitioner: Ruppalt [26-60214] (Caroline W. Tan ) [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 21 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60214] (Samuel Benjamin Goldstein ) [Entered: 06/12/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 19 COURT ORDER granting Motion to stay further proceedings in this court pending ruling on related case No. 25-60535 filed by Respondents USA and FCC. [ # 10 ] [26-60214] (RLL) [Entered: 04/17/2026 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 10 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Respondents FCC and USA to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: until the Court issues a ruling in closely related case, Case No. 25-60535. Date of service: 04/15/2026. [26-60214] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Respondent FCC to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: hold case in abeyance until the Court issues a ruling in a closely related case, Case No. 25-60535. Date of service: 04/15/2026 via US mail - Attorney for Respondent: Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General; email - Attorney for Respondents: Carr, Ellison, Tan; Attorney for Petitioner: Ruppalt [26-60214] (James Michael Carr ) [Entered: 04/15/2026 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-60214] (RLL) [Entered: 04/14/2026 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Caroline W. Tan for party(s) Respondent USA, in case 26-60214. [26-60214] (RLL) [Entered: 04/10/2026 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) James Michael Carr for party(s) Respondent FCC, in case 26-60214 [26-60214] (RLL) [Entered: 04/10/2026 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60214] (Caroline W. Tan ) [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60214] (James Michael Carr ) [Entered: 04/06/2026 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Mr. Phillip Aronoff, Mr. Joseph Bayly, Ms. Suzanne Bettac, Mr. Edward J. Blum, Mr. Cody Carnett, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Consumers' Research, Ms. Kersten Conway, Ms. Lynn Gibbs, Mr. Paul Gibbs, Mr. Kwang Ja Kirby, Mr. Tom Kirby, Ms. Jacqueline Klein, Mr. Robert Kull, Mr. James Romeo, Ms. Deanna Roth, Mr. Jeremy Roth and Ms. Rhonda Thomas. Date received in 5th Circuit: 04/01/2026. Administrative Record due on 05/12/2026 [26-60214] (MVM) [Entered: 04/02/2026 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
