Harris v. Keyes
| Jim R. Harris, Jr. |
| Warden Keyes, FCI Medium |
| 26-60328 |
| May 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/17/2026 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Jim R. Harris, Jr.. [26-60328] (RAJ) [Entered: 07/01/2026 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Awaiting DC Action: IFP pending. [26-60328] (KJ) [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jim R. Harris, Jr. [26-60328] (KJ) [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harris v. Keyes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jim R. Harris, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Jim R. Harris Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Keyes, FCI Medium | |
| Represented By: | Mitzi Dease Paige |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
