Fuselier v. RisCassi
| Johnny Fuselier, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated |
| John S. RisCassi, In his official capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home |
| 26-60519 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Fuselier. [26-60519] (RLL) [Entered: 06/30/2026 08:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fuselier v. RisCassi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Johnny Fuselier, Individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Randall Rice |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John S. RisCassi, In his official capacity as the Chief Operating Officer of the Armed Forces Retirement Home | |
| Represented By: | James E. Graves III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.