Abbas RamandiIn re: Abbas Ramandi
| In re: Abbas Lameei Ramandi |
| 26-60524 |
| June 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-60524] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Abbas Lameei Ramandi for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 06/29/2026. Fee due on 07/30/2026 for Petitioner Abbas Lameei Ramandi. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 07/30/2026 for Petitioner Abbas Lameei Ramandi. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Requires a copy of any order or opinion, or parts of the record essential to understand the matter set forth in the petition and fee is due [26-60524] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [26-60524] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/30/2026 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Abbas RamandiIn re: Abbas Ramandi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Abbas Lameei Ramandi | |
| Represented By: | Abbas Lameei Ramandi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
