Christian v. Walker
| Kimberly Monique Christian |
| James Christopher Walker, In his individual and official capacity as a Holmes and Madison County Chancellor |
| 26-60600 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 FILING FEE IS REQUIRED. Fee due on 08/28/2026 for Appellant Kimberly Monique Christian [26-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Kimberly Monique Christian [26-60600] (MVM) [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christian v. Walker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kimberly Monique Christian | |
| Represented By: | Kimberly Monique Christian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Christopher Walker, In his individual and official capacity as a Holmes and Madison County Chancellor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.