Kitnasamy v. Blanche
| Naveendhiran Kitnasamy |
| Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-60779 |
| September 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60779] (Amber Ashley Arthur ) [Entered: 09/18/2026 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Naveendhiran Kitnasamy. Date received in 5th Circuit: 09/14/2026. Immigration File Number: A221 350 344 Administrative Record due on 10/27/2026 [26-60779] (RAJ) [Entered: 09/17/2026 09:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kitnasamy v. Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Naveendhiran Kitnasamy | |
| Represented By: | Visuvanathan Rudrakumaran Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
