Pozo Romero v. Blanche
| Yenny Pozo Romero |
| Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-60892 |
| October 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60892] (Gerald Mark Alexander ) [Entered: 10/13/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Ms. Yenny Pozo Romero. Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/08/2026. Immigration File Number: A240 247 949. Administrative Record due on 11/23/2026 [26-60892] (SH) [Entered: 10/13/2026 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pozo Romero v. Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Yenny Pozo Romero | |
| Represented By: | Ismael Jose Labrador |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
