Labarca Romero v. Blanche
| Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero |
| Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-60961 |
| October 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for summary affirmance [9] Foreclosed Issues Case: NO and INCORPORATED RESPONSE to the Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Ms. Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero in 26-60961 [ # 2 ] Date of service: 10/29/2026 [26-60961] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: MOTION filed by Respondent Mr. Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General for summary affirmance [9] Foreclosed Issues Case: NO and INCORPORATED RESPONSE to the Motion for stay of removal filed by Petitioner Ms. Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero [ # 2 ] Date of service: 10/29/2026 via US mail - Petitioner Labarca Romero; email - Attorney for Respondents: OIL, Quick [26-60961] (Erik R. Quick ) [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INTENT TO DEPORT The petitioner is not in custody and is not yet scheduled for removal. Notice of Intent Due deadline satisfied. [26-60961] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: NOTICE OF INTENT TO DEPORT filed by Respondent Mr. Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General. The petitioner is not in custody and is not yet scheduled for removal. Date of Service: 10/29/2026 via US mail - Petitioner Labarca Romero; email - Attorney for Respondents: OIL, Quick. [26-60961] (Erik R. Quick ) [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Erik R. Quick for party(s) Respondent Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General, in case 26-60961. [26-60961] (SEP) [Entered: 10/29/2026 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [26-60961] (Erik R. Quick ) [Entered: 10/28/2026 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 FILING FEE is required. [26-60961] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION filed by Petitioner Ms. Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero for stay of removal [2] Notice of Intent Due on 11/02/2026 for Respondent Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General. Response/Opposition due on 11/06/2026. [26-60961] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Ms. Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero. Date received in 5th Circuit: 10/22/2026. Immigration File Number: A244 266 880 Fee due on 11/12/2026 for Petitioner Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero. Administrative Record due on 12/07/2026 [26-60961] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/27/2026 04:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Labarca Romero v. Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Represented By: | Erik R. Quick Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero | |
| Represented By: | Katielys Del Valle Labarca Romero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.