Montiel-Amador v. Blanche
| Herlin Nahin Montiel-Amador |
| Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General |
| 26-61023 |
| November 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [26-61023] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioner Mr. Herlin Nahin Montiel-Amador. Date received in 5th Circuit: 11/06/2026. Immigration File Number: A094 788 204 Administrative Record due on 12/21/2026 [26-61023] (RAJ) [Entered: 11/10/2026 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Montiel-Amador v. Blanche | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Todd Wallace Blanche, U.S. Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Herlin Nahin Montiel-Amador | |
| Represented By: | Elissa Stiles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.