Knox v. Cain
| Steve Knox |
| Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Marc McClure, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary |
| 26-70011 |
| September 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:13-CV-241. Electronic ROA due on 10/15/2026. [26-70011] (CAS) [Entered: 09/30/2026 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 12 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [12] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [26-70011] (CAS) [Entered: 09/30/2026 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 10 CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Mr. Robert Steven Mink, Sr., Esq. for Mr. Steve Knox. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: SMS ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 5:13-CV-241 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 09/28/2026 [26-70011] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2026 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 9 CJA APPOINTMENT for Attorney Mr. David Lamar Calder for Mr. Steve Knox. Counsel must use the eVoucher system to file the voucher at disposition of the case. Please see the attached document for further guidance. ORIGINATING COURT DISTRICT: SMS ORIGINATING CASE NUMBER: 5:13-CV-241 DATE OF APPOINTMENT: 09/28/2026 [26-70011] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DEATH PENALTY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Steve Knox [26-70011] (CAS) [Entered: 09/29/2026 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
