Bloedow v. CSX Trans, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROD R. BLOEDOW
Defendant / Appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
Case Number: 04-3773
Filed: June 11, 2004
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER filed to dismiss pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [04-3773] . (RLB) [Entered: 07/26/2004 03:53 PM]
July 26, 2004 Filing 17 Appellant MOTION filed to dismiss pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Motion filed by John D. Franklin for Appellant Rod R. Bloedow. Certificate of service date 7/21/04 [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 07/26/2004 03:44 PM]
June 25, 2004 Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM filed by John D. Franklin for Appellant Rod R. Bloedow: No hearings held in District Court. [04-3773] [14] (BLH) [Entered: 07/02/2004 12:45 PM]
June 25, 2004 Filing 13 PRE-ARGUMENT STATEMENT filed by John D. Franklin for Appellant Rod R. Bloedow [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 07/01/2004 03:50 PM]
June 25, 2004 Filing 12 APPEARANCE filed by Attorney John D. Franklin for Appellant Rod R. Bloedow [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 07/01/2004 03:50 PM]
June 24, 2004 Filing 11 APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Michael S. Wolly for Appellee Brotherhood of Loco [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 07/01/2004 03:42 PM]
June 23, 2004 Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Harold A. Ross for Appellee Brotherhood of Loco [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 06/23/2004 03:17 PM]
June 18, 2004 Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Todd A. Dawson for Appellee CSX Trans [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 06/21/2004 09:44 AM]
June 18, 2004 Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed by Attorney John B. Lewis for Appellee CSX Trans [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 06/21/2004 09:43 AM]
June 11, 2004 Filing 4 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 7/21/04 ; appellee brief due 8/24/04 ; appendix due 9/17/04 ; final appellant brief due 10/8/04 . [04-3773] final appellee brief due 10/8/04 ; . (RLB) [Entered: 06/11/2004 04:55 PM]
June 11, 2004 Filing 3 Electronic case filing. District court record can be downloaded electronically. [04-3773] (RLB) [Entered: 06/11/2004 04:55 PM]
June 11, 2004 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: rld (RLB) [Entered: 06/11/2004 04:55 PM]
June 11, 2004 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Rod R. Bloedow. Transcript needed: y  (RLB) [Entered: 06/11/2004 04:54 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bloedow v. CSX Trans, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROD R. BLOEDOW
Represented By: John D. Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Represented By: John B. Lewis
Represented By: Todd A. Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS
Represented By: Michael Stephen Wolly
Represented By: Harold A. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?