Kenneth Schreiber, et al v. Philips Display Components Co., et al
PHILIPS PACE, PHILIPS DISPLAY COMPONENTS CO., Philips Display Components Company and PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION |
GEORGE H. VANTINE, KENNETH C. SCHREIBER and MARY JANE LAMBERT |
07-2440 |
November 15, 2007 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 MANDATE ISSUED with no costs taxed. (RGF) [Entered: 12/03/2009 11:49 AM] |
Filing 60 ORDER filed denying petition for en banc rehearing [ # 58 ] filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. Karen Nelson Moore, Helene N. White, Circuit Judges; C. Roger Vinson, District Judge. (BLH) [Entered: 11/25/2009 02:28 PM] |
Filing 58 PETITION for en banc rehearing filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. Certificate of Service: 10/01/2009. (GVM) [Entered: 10/01/2009 04:40 PM] |
Filing 56 RULING granting in part the motion to extend time to file a petition for rehearing en banc [ # 52 ] filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. Extension granted to 10/01/2009. Mr. Mersol was also notified by telephone today. (BLH) [Entered: 09/22/2009 10:10 AM] |
Filing 54 REPLY filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE regarding Plaintiffs-Appellants' Opposition to Defendants-Appellees' Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc . Certificate of Service: 09/14/2009. (GVM) [Entered: 09/14/2009 04:57 PM] |
Filing 53 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion to extend time to file en banc petition, [ # 52 ]; previously filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE in 07-2440 ,regarding a motion to extend time to file rehearing petition, [ # 52 ]; previously filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE in 07-2440. Response from Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine Certificate of Service:09/14/2009. (DWZ) [Entered: 09/14/2009 11:29 AM] |
Filing 52 MOTION filed by Mr. Gregory Valentin Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE to extend time to file petition for rehearing until 10/16/2009 at 05:00 pm, to extend time to file petition for rehearing en banc until 10/16/2009 at 05:00 pm. Certificate of Service: 09/11/2009. (GVM) [Entered: 09/11/2009 04:44 PM] |
Filing 50 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: REVERSED and REMANDED, decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Karen Nelson Moore, Helene N. White (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; C. Roger Vinson (DISSENTING), U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Florida. (LKM) [Entered: 09/02/2009 08:58 AM] |
Filing 47 CAUSE ARGUED by Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine and Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Appellees Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE before Judges Moore, White and Vinson. (DTS) [Entered: 10/23/2008 01:56 PM] |
Filing 46 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service:10/07/2008. (DWZ) [Entered: 10/16/2008 12:07 PM] |
Filing 45 NOTICE OF DOCKETING ERROR, ENTRY REMOVED. Name of Document: REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Type of Error: The court cannot view or read the document. Action taken: Attorney instructed to redocket entry correctly. (RGF) [Entered: 10/15/2008 02:36 PM] |
Filing 44 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service:10/07/2008. (DWZ) [Entered: 10/07/2008 06:55 PM] |
Filing 42 ORDER filed granting motion regarding oral argument; 07-2440 will be the first case argued on 10/23/08. Entered by order of the court. (NB) [Entered: 10/06/2008 10:32 AM] |
Filing 41 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine regarding oral argument, to set the time for oral argument:. Certificate of service: 10/03/2008. (NB) [Entered: 10/06/2008 10:28 AM] |
Filing 38 Oral argument acknowledgement filed by Attorney Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Appellees Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. (LKM) [Entered: 09/19/2008 11:21 AM] |
Filing 37 Oral argument acknowledgement filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. (LKM) [Entered: 09/19/2008 11:20 AM] |
Filing 49 APPELLANT APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Email Consent: y. (RGF) [Entered: 08/20/2009 12:40 PM] |
Filing 36 Oral argument date set for 9:00 a.m. October 23, 2008. Notice of argument sent to counsel on 09/09/2008. (DTS) [Entered: 09/09/2008 03:29 PM] |
Filing 34 Corrected brief filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service:05/30/2008. REPLACES FINAL BRIEFS FILED 05/28/08. (RGF) [Entered: 06/02/2008 10:41 AM] |
Filing 33 SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service: 05/27/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 06/02/2008 08:57 AM] |
Filing 32 RULING granting motion to file supplemental appendix [31] filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. (RGF) [Entered: 06/02/2008 08:52 AM] |
Filing 31 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine to file supplemental appendix. Certificate of service: 05/27/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 06/02/2008 08:47 AM] |
Filing 30 APPELLEE FINAL BRIEF filed by Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. Copies: 06. Certificate of Service: 05/27/2008. Argument Request: requested. (RGF) [Entered: 05/30/2008 04:41 PM] |
Filing 28 APPELLANT FINAL BRIEF filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Copies:07. Certificate of Service: 05/27/2008. Argument Request: requested. (RGF) [Entered: 05/30/2008 04:35 PM] |
Filing 27 APPENDIX filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine Copies:05 - 3 VOLUMES. Certificate of Service: 05/05/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 05/07/2008 10:54 AM] |
Filing 26 RULING granting motion to extend time to file appendix [25] filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine; resetting briefing schedule: joint appendix now due 05/05/2008. final appellant brief now due 05/27/2008. final appellee brief now due 05/27/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 04/29/2008 08:09 AM] |
Filing 25 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine to extend time to file appendix. Certificate of service: 04/28/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 04/29/2008 08:07 AM] |
Filing 24 APPELLEE PROOF BRIEF filed by Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. Certificate of Service:04/07/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 04/10/2008 11:29 AM] |
Filing 23 RULING granting motion to extend time to file brief [22] filed by Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE; resetting briefing schedule: appellee brief now due 04/07/2008. joint appendix now due 04/28/2008. final appellant brief now due 05/19/2008. final appellee brief now due 05/19/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 03/20/2008 10:53 AM] |
Filing 22 Appellee MOTION filed by Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service:03/18/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 03/20/2008 10:49 AM] |
Filing 21 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (WJR) [Entered: 03/06/2008 11:25 AM] |
Filing 20 APPELLANT PROOF BRIEF filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service:02/26/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 03/04/2008 09:17 AM] |
Filing 19 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/27/2008. appellee brief now due 03/31/2008. joint appendix now due 04/24/2008. all final briefs now due 05/15/2008. (WJR) [Entered: 02/22/2008 09:51 AM] |
Filing 15 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine to file oversize brief. Certificate of service: 01/30/2008. (RGF) [Entered: 02/05/2008 03:01 PM] |
Filing 14 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 02/22/2008. appellee brief due 03/26/2008. joint appendix due 04/21/2008. all finals due 05/12/2008. (CAW) [Entered: 01/31/2008 01:49 PM] |
Filing 13 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/01/2008. appellee brief now due 03/05/2008. joint appendix now due 03/31/2008. all final briefs now due 04/21/2008. (WJR) [Entered: 01/10/2008 09:42 AM] |
Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/22/2008;. appellee brief due 02/25/2008;. appendix due 03/18/2008;. FINAL BRIEFS DUE: 04/08/2008 (RGF) [Entered: 12/12/2007 04:20 PM] |
Filing 10 Mediation conference has been scheduled for 01/08/2008 at 2:30 pm with Mr. Rack. (CAW) [Entered: 12/10/2007 03:17 PM] |
Filing 9 Mediation Office is involved in this appeal. (CAW) [Entered: 12/10/2007 03:16 PM] |
Filing 4 STATEMENT of ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. David W. Zoll for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. Certificate of Service:11/27/2007. (RGF) [Entered: 11/27/2007 02:35 PM] |
Filing 7 APPELLEE APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Todd A. Dawson for Appellees Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. (RGF) [Entered: 11/29/2007 04:02 PM] |
Filing 5 APPELLEE APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Gregory V. Mersol for Appellees Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Philips Display Components Co. and Philips PACE. (RGF) [Entered: 11/29/2007 03:59 PM] |
Filing 3 APPELLANT APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Ms. Lisa M. Smith for Appellants Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine. (RGF) [Entered: 11/26/2007 09:27 AM] |
Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER FORM filed by Mr. David W. Zoll for Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber, Ms. Mary Jane Lambert and Mr. George H. Vantine; Transcript not needed. (BLH) [Entered: 12/04/2007 11:29 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Mr. Roy G. Ford (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2007 02:54 PM] |
Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Ms. Mary Jane Lambert, Mr. Kenneth C. Schreiber and Mr. George H. Vantine. Transcript needed: y. (RGF) [Entered: 11/15/2007 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.