Roumeliote v. Long Term Disability
Plaintiff - Appellant: KIM ROUMELIOTE
Defendant - Appellee: LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES
Case Number: 07-3256
Filed: March 5, 2007
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 11, 2008 Roumeliote v. Long Term Disability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 920080911 Opinion
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roumeliote v. Long Term Disability
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KIM ROUMELIOTE
Represented By: Stanley L. Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES
Represented By: Brett K. Bacon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?