Coalition to Defend Affirmativ, et al v. Regents of the University of M, et al
||CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
|Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
||COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (BAMN), et al.,
|Intervenor - Appellee:
||MICHAEL COX, Michigan Attorney General
|Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
||REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
||March 25, 2008
||U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
We have the following opinions for this case:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 15, 2012
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's grant of the Defendants-Appellees' motion for summary judgment is REVERSED. The district court's denial of the University Defendants' motion to be dismissed as parties and its grant of the Cantrell Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment are AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Circuit Judge; Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Danny J. Boggs (DISSENTING), Martha Craig Daughtrey, Karen Nelson Moore, R. Guy Cole, Jr. (AUTHORING), Eric L. Clay, Julia Smith Gibbons (DISSENTING), John M. Rogers (DISSENTING), Jeffrey S. Sutton (DISSENTING), Deborah L. Cook, Richard Allen Griffin (DISSENTING), Helene N. White, Jane Branstetter Stranch, and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges. [08-1387, 08-1389, 08-1534, 09-1111]
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?