United Transportation Union v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
| UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION |
| CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN |
| 08-3998 |
| August 15, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Labor: Railway Labor Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
ORDER filed to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction for a non appealable order. Cornelia G. Kennedy, Circuit Judge; Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge and Alice M. Batchelder, Circuit Judge. (JEC) [Entered: 12/15/2008 02:50 PM]
|
| Filing 30 REPLY filed by Mr. Clinton Joseph Miller, III for United Transportation Union regarding CSXT's Motion to Dismiss . Certificate of Service: 10/29/2008. (CJM) [Entered: 10/29/2008 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 28 LETTER SENT to hold briefing in abeyance pending appellee's motion to dismiss. (JEC) [Entered: 10/23/2008 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 25 MOTION filed by Mr. John B. Lewis for CSX Transportation, Inc. to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. Certificate of Service: 10/22/2008. (JBL) [Entered: 10/22/2008 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 23 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. by John B. Lewis. Certificate of Service: 10/22/2008. (JBL) [Entered: 10/22/2008 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 22 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/05/2008;. appellee brief due 12/05/2008; (JEC) [Entered: 09/26/2008 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 21 RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Volume 1 ; (JEC) [Entered: 09/26/2008 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Michael Stephen Wolly for Appellee Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen Certificate of Service: 09/04/2008. (MSW) [Entered: 09/04/2008 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen by Michael S. Wolly. Certificate of Service: 09/04/2008. (MSW) [Entered: 09/04/2008 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 14 DESIGNATION of RECORD filed by Attorney Mr. Ronald M. Johnson for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. Certificate of Service: 08/27/2008. (RMJ) [Entered: 08/27/2008 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Ronald M. Johnson for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. Certificate of Service: 08/27/2008. (RMJ) [Entered: 08/27/2008 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee CSX Transportation, Inc. by Ronald M. Johnson. Certificate of Service: 08/27/2008. (RMJ) [Entered: 08/27/2008 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 DESIGNATION of RECORD filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Robert Elliott, III for Appellant United Transportation Union Certificate of Service: 08/25/2008. (DRE) [Entered: 08/26/2008 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Robert Elliott, III for Appellant United Transportation Union Certificate of Service: 08/25/2008. (DRE) [Entered: 08/26/2008 02:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Robert Elliott, III for Appellant United Transportation Union. Certificate of Service:08/25/2008. (DRE) [Entered: 08/26/2008 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant United Transportation Union by Daniel R. Elliott, III. Certificate of Service: 08/25/2008. (DRE) [Entered: 08/25/2008 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant United Transportation Union by Clinton J. Miller, III. Certificate of Service: 08/25/2008. (DRE) [Entered: 08/25/2008 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Jill Colyer (JEC) [Entered: 08/15/2008 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant United Transportation Union. Transcript needed: n. (JEC) [Entered: 08/15/2008 09:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
