Archie Dixon v. Marc Houk
| ARCHIE DIXON |
| MARC C. HOUK, Warden |
| 08-4019 |
| August 21, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Archie Dixon v. Marc Houk |
 Dixon v. Houk
|
|
Dixon v. Houk
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111813259
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED and Dixon's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. Decision for publication. Gilbert S. Merritt (DISSENTING), Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING), and R. Guy Cole, Jr., Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Archie Dixon v. Marc Houk | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: ARCHIE DIXON | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Benza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: MARC C. HOUK, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Thomas E. Madden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
