Sean Carter v. Margaret Bradshaw
Petitioner - Appellee: SEAN CARTER
Respondent - Appellant: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Warden
Case Number: 08-4377
Filed: October 23, 2008
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2011 Summary Carter v. Bradshaw
April 18, 2013 Sean Carter v. Terry Tibbals

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111660171 Per Curiam OPINION filed : VACATED and REMANDED, decision not for publication. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., R. Guy Cole , Jr., and John M. Rogers, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sean Carter v. Margaret Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: SEAN CARTER
Represented By: Linda E. Prucha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Warden
Represented By: Holly E. LeClair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?