James Hanna v. Margaret Bagley
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES HANNA
Defendant - Appellee: MARGARET BAGLEY, Warden
Case Number: 09-3360
Filed: April 3, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 11, 2012 Summary Hanna v. Bagley

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111428386 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment denying the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING) and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Hanna v. Margaret Bagley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JAMES HANNA
Represented By: Rachel G. Troutman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MARGARET BAGLEY, Warden
Represented By: Thomas E. Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?