Michael Gardner v. USA
MICHAEL GARDNER |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
09-6308 |
October 30, 2009 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
P.I.: Medical Malpractice |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111087877 OPINION filed : The district court's dismissal of Gardner's complaint is AFFIRMED; the motion certifying question of law is DENIED[4099615-2] filed by Mr. David Randolph Smith, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge and Arthur J. Tarnow, Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan sitting by designation, AUTHORING. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Gardner v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: MICHAEL GARDNER | |
Represented By: | David Randolph Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | S. Delk Kennedy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.