Lon Walker v. Jim Morrow
LON S. WALKER |
JIM MORROW, Warden |
09-6537 |
December 22, 2009 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Lon Walker v. Jim Morrow |
Lon Walker v. Jim Morrow |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111207300 OPINION filed : the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and a conditional writ of habeas corpus is issued, directing the State of Tennessee to retry Petitioner within 120 days from the date of this order or release him from custody; decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge authoring and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge concurring. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lon Walker v. Jim Morrow | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: LON S. WALKER | |
Represented By: | Caryll S. Alpert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: JIM MORROW, Warden | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Lynn Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.