Victor Guzman v. US Dept Homeland Security
| VICTOR GUZMAN |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY |
| 10-2243 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Deportation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Guzman v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111301187
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr. (AUTHORING), Jeffrey S. Sutton, and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Victor Guzman v. US Dept Homeland Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: VICTOR GUZMAN | |
| Represented By: | Roger R. Rathi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Adam L. Goldman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
