Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc.
| HAROLD WASEK |
| ARROW ENERGY SERVICES, INC. |
| 10-2418 |
| October 29, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Wasek v. Arrow Energy Servs., Inc.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111342838
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's grant of summary judgment to Arrow Energy is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Richard Allen Griffin and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges; Amul R. Thapar, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harold Wasek v. Arrow Energy Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: HAROLD WASEK | |
| Represented By: | Mandel I. Allweil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ARROW ENERGY SERVICES, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Deanna Swisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
