NLRB v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. |
10-2549 |
November 30, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
NLRB v. ADT Security Services, Inc. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111389893 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The National Labor Relations Board's Application for Enforcement of its Order is GRANTED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. John M. Rogers and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Benita Y. Pearson, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: NLRB v. ADT Security Services, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD | |
Represented By: | Linda Dreeben |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Bernard Phillip Jeweler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.