V&M Star Steel v. Centimark Corporation
| V&M STAR STEEL |
| CENTIMARK CORPORATION |
| 10-3584 |
| May 7, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Contract: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 V&M Star Steel v. Centimark Corp.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111284554
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment in favor of Centimark is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for trial. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey, Karen Nelson Moore, and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: V&M Star Steel v. Centimark Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: V&M STAR STEEL | |
| Represented By: | Janice T. O'Halloran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CENTIMARK CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | John P. Liekar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
