USA v. Rashawn Gill
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RASHAWN GILL |
| 10-3642 |
| May 24, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111371529
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgments of the district court as to the motion to suppress and the denial for acquittal as to Count Threee are AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr. (AUTHORING) and Martha Craig Daughtrey, Circuit Judges; and Paul Lewis Maloney, Chief United States District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Rashawn Gill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Karl P. Kadon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: RASHAWN GILL | |
| Represented By: | Ravert J. Clark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
