T. Marzetti Company v. Roskam Baking Co
| T. MARZETTI COMPANY |
| ROSKAM BAKING CO |
| 10-3784 |
| June 28, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Property Rights: Trademark |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 T. Marzetti Co. v. Roskam Baking Co
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111318287
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's judgment in favor of defendant Roskam Baking Company is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Martha Craig Daughtrey (AUTHORING), Karen Nelson Moore, and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: T. Marzetti Company v. Roskam Baking Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: T. MARZETTI COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Blickensderfer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ROSKAM BAKING CO | |
| Represented By: | Alycia N. Broz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
