First Defiance Financial Corpo, et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit First Defiance Financial Corpo, et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

First Defiance Financial Corpo, et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:	FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF THE MIDWEST and FIRST INSURANCE AND INVESTMENTS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:	PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number:	10-3943
Filed:	August 10, 2010
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
August 1, 2012	First Defiance Fin. Corp. v. Progressive Cas. Ins.

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 1, 2012	Filing 6111386687 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's decision to subtract the Cincinnati Insurance $50,000 pay-out from damages award is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. The district court's liability and damages rulings are AFFIRMED in all other respects. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Jeffrey S. Sutton (AUTHORING), and Deborah L. Cook (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges. [10-3943, 10-3944]

Date Filed

Document Text

August 1, 2012

Filing 6111386687 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's decision to subtract the Cincinnati Insurance $50,000 pay-out from damages award is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. The district court's liability and damages rulings are AFFIRMED in all other respects. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Jeffrey S. Sutton (AUTHORING), and Deborah L. Cook (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges. [10-3943, 10-3944]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: First Defiance Financial Corpo, et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee cross-appellant: FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Represented By:	Phillip Jude Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee cross-appellant: FIRST FEDERAL BANK OF THE MIDWEST
Represented By:	Phillip Jude Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee cross-appellant: FIRST INSURANCE AND INVESTMENTS, INC.
Represented By:	Phillip Jude Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellant cross-appellee: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By:	Scott L. Schmookler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?