Gerald Rayborn v. USA
Petitioner - Appellee: GERALD RAYBORN
Respondent - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 10-5134
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 20, 2012 Gerald Rayborn v. USA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111375946 OPINION filed: The decision of the district court to grant Rayborn's motion to vacate is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), and Helene N. White, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gerald Rayborn v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellee: GERALD RAYBORN
Represented By: Karimbumkara Jayaraman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Frederick H. Godwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?