Joseph Dyer, III v. James Morrow
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH P. DYER, III
Respondent - Appellee: JAMES MORROW
Case Number: 10-5137
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 7, 2012 Joseph Dyer, III v. James Morrow

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111426007 OPINION filed : Petition for a writ of habeus corpus should be dismissed with prejudice . Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs,(AUTHORING) Circuit Judge; Julia Smith Gibbons,(CONCURRING) Circuit Judge and Thomas B. Russell, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Dyer, III v. James Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JOSEPH P. DYER, III
Represented By: Thomas Clifton Greenholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: JAMES MORROW
Represented By: Andrew H. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?