Cheryl Stine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Com
| CHERYL STINE |
| STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY |
| 10-5189 |
| February 25, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Contract: Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Cheryl Stine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Com |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6110997432
OPINION filed : AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Richard F. Suhrheinrich, Circuit Judge; Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge Concurring, and Deborah L. Cook, Authoring Circuit Judge.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cheryl Stine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Com | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: CHERYL STINE | |
| Represented By: | David T. Sparks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | David T. Klapheke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
