Sandra Culver v. CCL Label Inc.
SANDRA M. CULVER |
CCL LABEL INC. |
10-5353 |
April 1, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111180019 OPINION filed : we AFFIRM the district court's grant of CCL's Rule 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law, and its denial of Culver's Rule 50 and 59 motions to alter or ament judgment, for judgment as a matter of law, and for a new trial; decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge; Helene N. White, Circuit Judge and Michael H. Watson, U.S. District Judge Authoring, for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Sandra Culver v. CCL Label Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: SANDRA M. CULVER | |
Represented By: | Ronald W. McAfee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CCL LABEL INC. | |
Represented By: | Michael F. Rafferty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.