USA v. Danny Cathey
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANNY LEE CATHEY
Case Number: 10-5374
Filed: April 7, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 19, 2012 USA v. Danny Cathey

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111340876 OPINION filed : The district court's denial of Cathey's Motion to Supress and his Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, or in the alternative, for a new trial are AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Damon J. Keith, Circuit Judge; Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge and Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge, Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Danny Cathey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: G. David Sparks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DANNY LEE CATHEY
Represented By: Len Willis Ogden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?