Idella Rutherford v. Britthaven, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant: IDELLA RUTHERFORD
Defendant - Appellee: BRITTHAVEN, INC.
Case Number: 10-5783
Filed: June 30, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 21, 2011 Idella Rutherford v. Britthaven, Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6111164041 OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Boyce F. Martin , Jr., Circuit Judge; Ralph B. Guy , Jr., Circuit Judge and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge, authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Idella Rutherford v. Britthaven, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: IDELLA RUTHERFORD
Represented By: Matthew Harper Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BRITTHAVEN, INC.
Represented By: Leslie Patterson Vose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?