USA v. Clarence McCoy
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CLARENCE MCCOY
Case Number: 10-6099
Filed: September 8, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 8, 2012 USA v. Clarence McCoy

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111299191 OPINION filed : Clarence McCoy and John McQueen's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge; Jane Branstetter Stranch, Circuit Judge and James S. Gwin, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation, authoring. [10-6099, 10-6106]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Clarence McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: James E. Arehart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CLARENCE MCCOY
Represented By: Andrew Martin Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?