Tom Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Comp
TOM SEEGER |
CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC |
10-6148 |
September 20, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Diversity - Civil Rights Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111298151 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler , Jr. and Richard Allen Griffin (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Arthur J. Tarnow (DISSENTING) U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Tom Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Comp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: TOM SEEGER | |
Represented By: | Randolph H. Freking |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CINCINNATI BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, LLC | |
Represented By: | Nathaniel Lampley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.