John Roll v. Bowling Green Metalforming, LL
JOHN RANDALL ROLL |
BOWLING GREEN METALFORMING, LLC |
10-6185 |
September 28, 2010 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
John Roll v. Bowling Green Metalforming, LL |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111183581 OPINION filed : The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Decision not for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Gilbert S. Merritt, authoring Circuit Judge; R. Guy Cole , Jr., Circuit Judge and Thomas A. Varlan, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: John Roll v. Bowling Green Metalforming, LL | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: JOHN RANDALL ROLL | |
Represented By: | David T. Sparks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: BOWLING GREEN METALFORMING, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jaron P. Blandford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.