Jamie Quinn v. Ron Griffith, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMIE QUINN
Defendant - Appellant: RON GRIFFITH and PIPE & PILING SUPPLIES (U.S.A.) LTD., a foreign profit corporation
Case Number: 11-1672
Filed: May 25, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 21, 2013 Jamie Quinn v. Pipe & Piling Supplies

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jamie Quinn v. Ron Griffith, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: JAMIE QUINN
Represented By: Frederick Edward Mackraz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RON GRIFFITH
Represented By: John H. Underhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: PIPE & PILING SUPPLIES (U.S.A.) LTD., a foreign profit corporation
Represented By: John H. Underhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?