Terrence Henderson v. Carmen Palmer
| TERRENCE HENDERSON |
| CARMEN PALMER, Warden |
| 11-1943 |
| July 29, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6111816050
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of the Petitioner's habeas corpus petition is VACATED, and the first, second, third, and fifth claims of error are REMANDED to the district court for consideration. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr. and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges; Algenon L. Marbley (AUTHORING), U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Terrence Henderson v. Carmen Palmer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: TERRENCE HENDERSON | |
| Represented By: | Terrence Henderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: CARMEN PALMER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Laura A. Cook |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
