Camille Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner
CAMILLE HADDAD |
ALEXANDER, ZELMANSKI, DANNER & FIORITTO, PLLC |
11-1954 |
August 3, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner & Fioritto, PLLC |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6111472098 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Eugene E. Siler, Jr. (AUTHORING) and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges; and James L. Graham, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Camille Haddad v. Alexander, Zelmanski, Danner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: CAMILLE HADDAD | |
Represented By: | Daniel P. Feinberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: ALEXANDER, ZELMANSKI, DANNER & FIORITTO, PLLC | |
Represented By: | Mark B. Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.