William Ryal v. Blaine Lafler
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIAM RYAL
Respondent - Appellee: BLAINE LAFLER
Case Number: 11-1961
Filed: August 4, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 18, 2012 William Ryal v. Blaine Lafler

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111534495 OPINION filed :The district court's judgement is AFFIRMED, decision not for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and Raymond M. Kethledge [AUTHORING], Circuit Judge.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William Ryal v. Blaine Lafler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: WILLIAM RYAL
Represented By: Robert J. Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: BLAINE LAFLER
Represented By: Laura Graves Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?